
.png)
Why is the new nonlocal-state paradigm an Akashia paradigm? The reason for this is clear and can be spelled out. When it comes-and now it is coming-it heralds the shift from a fragmented “local-state” paradigm inherited from Newton, to the new nonlocal-state paradigm based on the latest advances in quantum and bio-physics and cosmology. Maintain the dominant conception and hope to adapt it to the new findings-or create a new and different conception? The latter is a revolution: a paradigm-shift.

As a result the natural sciences find themselves on the horns of a dilemma. They are nonlocally connected over all points. In this universe all things are connected, but they are not just locally connected, at a given point in space and time. It appears that we live is an integral universe where all things affect all other things. The astounding-and for the established theories entirely mysterious-observation is instant, space- and time-transcending interconnection among nearly all the things scientists observe in the principal fields of investigation.
Worldshift crack free#
Today relativity theory itself fails to mesh with new observations, and the challenger, quantum theory, is not free of problems either. There was a paradigm-shift at the turn of the 20th century when key observations failed to mesh with the basic assumptions of Newtonian physics: scientists soon abandoned those assumptions and adopted Einstein’s revolutionary theories in their place. The enterprise of science advances through such “paradigm-shifts”-the periodic renewal of its fundamental conceptions. The theory needs to be replaced a fundamentally new conception must take its place.

If the mismatch is persistent, piecemeal adjustments will not work. For a while they explain the facts that come to light in the relevant fields, but when key observations fail to mesh with the dominant conception, the theories are either revised, or they break down. Theories in science are not indefinitely tenable.
